We have a sophisticated and active audience. Here are comments from two JRT readers:
Cyndi on Not a Terrorist:
Very good writings. As you stated, why are we so quick to state the actions in SF were not an act of terrorism? How can they state such when in terrorist plans they clearly spelled out that drive by's and run-overs would be one of their methods of operations as well as murdering those who would come to their aid when they are pretending to be "broke down" on the side of the road. No, I believe the reason is that the police depts are not equipped to handle the public's expectations of protection and the liberals want to give every muslim their fair day in court because of "civil rights". <oh sigh> What about the families of those mowed over? What rights do they have for justice?
Leah dishes out to Jewish men:
Why am I not at all surprised that Adam is the son of a "Jewish" father and a Christian mother. My guess is that they were in love and felt that it was only important to raise free children, who would be
"good people." For several decades the majority of American Jewish men have been sexually and romantically lured by the siren call of women who could "liberate" them from the restrictions of their Jewish pasts. Instead of embracing women who reminded them of their loving mothers, and instead of embracing and loving the laws and traditions that structured a sane society, the majority of Jewish men have fled to the worship of liberalism. Given his "freedom" from anything Jewish but his last name, a kid like Adam sought the structure of Islam. Some improvement. Great going, "Jewish" dads.
Readers like these make all our writing efforts worth it.
posted by: jrtelegraph
Comments